I mostly play Blitz, but I do 3v3 when I have time. In my humble experience, an experienced Alpha is a team effort. No bones about it - if my teammate goes after Alpha, I jump in, and our other teammate jumps in and we just pound on Alpha, regardless of the consequences.
Generally, if they see Alpha go down, some will run off and regroup themselves. However, trying to 1v1 Alpha is usually not a good idea. 2v1 can sometimes win, but I’ve seen players 3v1 Alpha sometimes and still lose.
I don’t know what constitues as “broken” but Alpha is a good gap closer. However, in the context of strictly closing distance, Taka has the lead. I see more Takas and Koshkas bouncing around like nobodys business. Now this may be due to my tier (which I have no idea what it is because I never bothered to check) but its probably quite low.
I know that in MOBAs and even other games as well, players CAN mistake expertise for brokenness. I always take that into consideration. Is Taka broken? I don’t think he is - because I’ve seen terrible Takas, as well as good ones.
There was one match that I refer to as, “The Tale of Two Takas,” where we had a Taka, and the enemy team had a Taka…and both Takas were trying to out-Taka the other Taka. I thought to myself, “Well, hes keeping the enemy Taka occupied, so thats a plus.”
I play Celeste a lot and Taka is a hard counter to Celeste; its just the way it works. There has to be a counter because I mean, she’d be broken if she didn’t have a counter. In Alphas case, yes, she does have counters as previous posters have mentioned.
However, none of the counters seem to be the heroes you like to play. Alpha doesn’t deserve the nerf-bat because you don’t want to adapt - that is unfair to Alpha mains everywhere!